ABSTRACT
We sought to determine parameters of the acute phase response, a feature of innate immunity activated by infectious noxae and cancer, deranged by Covid-19 and establish oncological indices' prognostic potential for patients with concomitant cancer and Covid-19. Between 27/02 and 23/06/2020, OnCovid retrospectively accrued 1,318 consecutive referrals of patients with cancer and Covid-19 aged 18 from the U.K., Spain, Italy, Belgium, and Germany. Patients with myeloma, leukemia, or insufficient data were excluded. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and prognostic index (PI) were evaluated for their prognostic potential, with the NLR, PLR, and PNI risk stratifications dichotomized around median values and the pre-established risk categorizations from literature utilized for the mGPS and PI. 1,071 eligible patients were randomly assorted into a training set (TS, n=529) and validation set (VS, n=542) matched for age (67.9±13.3 TS, 68.5±13.5 VS), presence of 1 comorbidity (52.1% TS, 49.8% VS), development of 1 Covid-19 complication (27% TS, 25.9% VS), and active malignancy at Covid-19 diagnosis (66.7% TS, 61.6% VS). Among all 1,071 patients, deceased patients tended to categorize into poor risk groups for the NLR, PNI, mGPS, and PI (P<0.0001) with a return to pre-Covid-19 diagnosis NLR, PNI, and mGPS categorizations following recovery (P<0.01). In the TS, higher mortality rates were associated with NLR>6 (44.6% vs 28%, P<0.0001), PNI<40 (46.6% vs 20.9%, P<0.0001), mGPS (50.6% for mGPS2 vs 30.4% and 11.4% for mGPS1 and 0, P<0.0001), and PI (50% for PI2 vs 40% for PI1 and 9.1% for PI0, P<0.0001). Findings were confirmed in the VS (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Patients in poor risk categories had shorter median overall survival [OS], (NLR>6 30 days 95%CI 1-63, PNI<40 23 days 95%CI 10-35, mGPS2 20 days 95%CI 8-32, PI2 23 days 95%CI 1-56) compared to patients in good risk categories, for whom median OS was not reached (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The PLR was not associated with survival. Analyses of survival in the VS confirmed the NLR (P<0.0001), PNI (P<0.0001), PI (P<0.01), and mGPS (P<0.001) as predictors of survival. In a multivariable Cox regression model including all inflammatory indices and pre-established prognostic factors for severe Covid-19 including sex, age, comorbid burden, malignancy status, and receipt of anti-cancer therapy at Covid-19 diagnosis, the PNI was the only factor to emerge with a significant hazard ratio [HR] in both TS and VS analysis (TS HR 1.97, 95%CI 1.19-3.26, P=0.008;VS HR 2.48, 95%CI 1.47- 4.20, P=0.001). We conclude that systemic inflammation drives mortality from Covid-19 through hypoalbuminemia and lymphocytopenia as measured by the PNI and propose the PNI as the OnCovid Inflammatory Score (OIS) in this context.
ABSTRACT
Background: Little is known about natural anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence post COVID-19 and safety of vaccines in COVID-19 survivors with cancer. Methods: Among 2795 consecutive patients (pts) with COVID-19 and cancer registered to OnCovid between 01/2020 and 02/2021, we examined natural seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies (SC2Ab, IgM or IgG) in pts tested post-infection. We analysed prevalence and safety of SARS-Cov-2 vaccine administration in pts who underwent clinical re-assessment at participating institutions. Results: Out of 350 pts tested for SC2Ab, 318 (90.9%) had a positive SC2Ab titre post-convalescence. Neither baseline features (sex, age, comorbidities, smoking history, tumour stage/status, anticancer-therapy and primary tumour) nor COVID-19-specific features (complications, hospitalization, sequelae) were significantly associated SC2Ab status. Receipt of COVID-19 specific therapy was higher among SC2Ab+ pts (62.6% vs 40.6%, p=0.0156). Out of 593 pts with known vaccination status, 178 (30%) had received 1 dose, whilst 38 pts (6.4%) received 2 doses of mRNA based (70.2%) or viral vector vaccine (17.4%). Vaccinated pts were more likely aged ≥65 years (59% vs 48.3%, p=0.0172), with loco-regional tumour stage (56% vs 40.8%, p=0.0014), on anti-cancer therapy at COVID-19 (49.1% vs 38.2%, p=0.0168) and history of prior hospitalisation due to COVID-19 (61.8% vs 48.3%, p=0.0029). Vaccine-related adverse events were reported for 18/56 evaluable pts (32.1%) and included injection site reactions (50%), fever (44.4%), arthralgias (33.3%), fatigue (33.3%) and allergy (5.5%). No long-term vaccine-related morbidity was reported. Conclusions: We report high seroprevalence (>90%) of SC2Ab in convalescent cancer pts who survived COVID-19 irrespective of baseline demographics, oncological characteristics and COVID-19 severity. COVID-19 vaccines appear to be safe in cancer pts with history of prior infection. Clinical trial identification: NCT04393974. Legal entity responsible for the study: Imperial College London. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: D.J. Pinato: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: ViiV Healthcare;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eisai;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Nanostring tech. A. Cortellini: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: SunPharma;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Astellas. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Background: There is uncertainty as to the contribution of cancer patients' features on severity and mortality from Covid-19 and little guidance as to the role of anti-cancer and anti-Covid-19 therapy in this population. Method(s): OnCovid is a retrospective observational study conducted across 19 European centers that recruited cancer patients aged >18 and diagnosed with Covid-19 between 26/02 and 01/04/2020. Uni- and multivariable regression models were used to evaluate predictors of Covid-19 severity and mortality. Result(s): We identified 890 patients from UK (n=218, 24%), Italy (n=343, 37%), Spain (n=323, 36%) and Germany (n=6, 1%). Most patients were male (n=503, 56%) had a diagnosis of solid malignancy (n=753, 84%) and 556 (62%) had active disease. Mean (+/-SD) patient age was 68+/-13 years, and 670 (75%) had >1 co-morbidity, most commonly hypertension (n=386, 43%). Commonest presenting symptoms were fever (n=569, 63%) and cough (n=448, 50%), beginning 6.3 (+/-9.5 SD) days before diagnosis. Most patients (n=565, 63%) had >1 complication from Covid-19, including respiratory failure (n=527, 59%) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (n=127, 22%). In total, 110 patients (14%) were escalated to high-dependency or intensive care. At time of analysis, 299 patients had died (33%). Multi-variate logistic regression identified male gender, age>65 (p<0.0001) presence of >2 comorbidities (p=0.001) active malignancy (p=0.07) as predictors of complicated Covid-19. Mortality was associated with active malignancy (p<0.0001), age>65 and co-morbid burden (p=0.002). Provision of chemotherapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy was not associated with higher mortality. Exposure to anti-malarials alone (chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, n=182, p<0.001) or in combination with anti-virals (n=195, p<0.001) or tocilizumab (n=51, p=0.004) was associated with improved mortality compared to patients who did not receive any of these therapies (n=446) independent of patients' gender, age, tumour stage and severity of Covid-19. Conclusion(s): This study highlights the clinical utility of demographic factors for individualized risk-stratification of patients and supports further research into emerging anti Covid-19 therapeutics in SARS-Cov-2 infected cancer patients. Clinical trial identification: NCT04393974. Legal entity responsible for the study: Imperial College London. Funding(s): Has not received any funding. Disclosure: D.J. Pinato: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: ViiV Healthcare;Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bayer;Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS;Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: MiNa Therapeutics;Advisory/Consultancy: Eisai;Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche;Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca;Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Copyright © 2020 European Society for Medical Oncology
ABSTRACT
Background: The European SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had its first epicentre in Italy, particularly in the area of Bergamo. In spite of a significant mortality rate, in the majority of cases the spectrum of Covid-19 ranges from asymptomatic to mildly symptomatic infection. No information is available on the prevalence and clinical impact of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic SARSCoV-2 infection among actively treated cancer patients during pandemic. Patients and methods: From April 1st, 2020 to the end of the month, 560 consecutive and unselected patients, scheduled for anticancer treatment at our facility and without clinical suspicious of Covid-19, were evaluated and tested for SARSCoV-2. We implemented a two-step diagnostics, including a rapid serological immunoassay for anti-SARSCoV-2 IgG/IgM and a pharyngeal swab RT-PCR assay in case of IgM seropositivity. Results: In 560 patients, 172 (31%) resulted positive for SARSCoV-2 IgM/IgG antibodies, regardless of type of cancer, stage and treatment. All IgM-seropositives were then tested with RT-PCR pharyngeal swabs and 55/146 (38%) proved to be SARSCoV-2 carriers, with slightly difference between mildly symptomatic vs. asymptomatic patients (38 vs. 17). Therefore, the two-step procedure allowed the identification of 55 (10%) silent carriers in the whole study population and magnified the number needed to test (NNT) with the pharyngeal swab RT-PCR assay to detect a silent virus carrier (NNT: 2.6 vs. 10, with or without serological selection). At a very early follow up (8 wks), in 114 SARSCoV-2-seropostive/RT-PCR-negative patients, who continued their anticancer therapies, none but one developed a symptomatic Covid-19 illness. Conclusions: Among cancer patients, the two-step diagnostics strategy with serology followed by pharyngeal swab for asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic SARSCoV-2 infection is feasible and effective and can help selecting cancer patients on treatment who might be silent carriers of the virus. The early safety outcome of patients previously exposed to SARSCoV-2 supports the recommendation to continue active treatment, at least in the case of negative RT-PCR test.
ABSTRACT
Background: ICI are widely used in the treatment of various cancer types. It has been hypothesized that ICI couldconfer an increased risk of severe acute lung injury or other complications associated with severe acute respiratorysyndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Methods: We analyzed data from 113 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 while on treatment with ICI without chemotherapy in 19 hospitals in North America, Europe, and Australia. Data collected included details onsymptoms, comorbidities, medications, treatments and investigations for COVID-19, and outcomes (hospitaladmission, ICU admission, and mortality). Results: The median age was 63 years (range 27-86);40 (35%) patients were female. Most common malignancies were melanoma (n=64, 57%), non-small cell lung cancer (n=19, 17%), and renal cell carcinoma (n=11, 10%);30(27%) patients were treated for early (neoadjuvant/adjuvant) and 83 (73%) for advanced cancer. Most patientsreceived anti-PD-1 (n=85, 75%), combination anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 (n=15, 13%), or anti-PD-L1 (n=8, 7%) ICI.Comorbidities included cardiovascular disease (n=31, 27%), diabetes (n=17, 15%), and pulmonary disease (n=14, 12%). Symptoms were present in 68 (60%) patients;46 (68%) had fever, 40 (59%) cough, and 23 (34%) dyspnea.Overall, ICI was interrupted in 58 (51%) patients. At data cutoff, 33 (29%) patients were admitted to hospital, 6 (5%)to ICU, and 9 (8%) patients died. COVID-19 was the primary cause of death in 7 patients, 3 of whom were admittedto ICU. Cancer types in patients who died were melanoma (2), non-small cell lung cancer (2), renal cell carcinoma(2), and others (3);all (9) patients had advanced cancer. Administered treatments were oxygen therapy (8), mechanical ventilation (2), vasopression (2), antibiotics (7), antiviral drugs (4), glucocorticoids (2), and anti-IL-6 (2).Of all hospitalized patients, 20 (61%) had been discharged and 4 (12%) were still in hospital at data cutoff. Conclusion: The mortality rate of COVID-19 in patients on ICI is higher than rates reported for the generalpopulation without comorbidities but may not be higher than rates reported for the cancer population. Despite thesepreliminary findings, COVID-19 patients on ICI may not have symptoms and a proportion may continue ICI.Correlative analyses are ongoing and will be presented.
ABSTRACT
Background: The European SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had its first epicentre in Italy, particularly in the area of Bergamo. In spite of a significant mortality rate, in the majority of cases the spectrum of COVID-19 ranges from asymptomatic to mildly symptomatic infection. No information is available on the prevalence and clinical impact of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection among actively treated cancer patients during pandemic. Methods: From April 1st, 2020 to the end of the month, 560 consecutive and unselected patients, scheduled for anticancer treatment at our facility and without clinical suspicious of COVID-19, were evaluated and tested for SARS-CoV-2. We implemented a two-step diagnostics, including a rapid serological immunoassay for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM and a pharyngeal swab RT-PCR assay in case of IgM seropositivity. Results: In 560 patients, 172 (31%) resulted positive for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG antibodies, regardless of type of cancer, stage and treatment. All IgM-seropositives were then tested with RT-PCR pharyngeal swabs and 55/146 (38%) proved to be SARS-CoV-2 carriers, with slightly difference b/w mildly symptomatic vs. asymptomatic patients (38 vs. 17). Therefore, the two-step procedure allowed the identification of 55 (10%) silent carriers in the whole study population and magnified the number needed to test (NNT) with the pharyngeal swab RT-PCR assay to detect a silent virus carrier (NNT: 2.6 vs. 10, with or without serological selection). At a very early follow up (8 wks), in 114 SARS-CoV-2-seropostive/RT-PCR-negative patients, who continued their anticancer therapies, none but one developed a symptomatic COVID-19 illness. Conclusions: Among cancer patients, the two-step diagnostics strategy with serology followed by pharyngeal swab for asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is feasible and effective and can help selecting cancer patients on treatment who might be silent carriers of the virus. The early safety outcome of patients previously exposed to SARS-CoV-2 supports the recommendation to continue active treatment, at least in the case of negative RT-PCR test. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cancer patients are more susceptible to infections and potentially at higher risk to develop COVID-19. Tumor type and antitumor treatment may also affect both the susceptibility to and the severity of SARS COV-2. Methods: To analyze the distribution of patients who developed COVID-19 during active antineoplastic therapy and the related clinical course by tumor type, stage and class of oncologic treatment (chemo, immune, biologic, other) a multicenter, retro-prospective, observational study was proposed to the Hospital Medical Oncologic Units of the National Health Service in Italy (168 centers of the Collegio Italiano dei Primari Oncologi Medici Ospedalieri -CIPOMO). Data were collected on demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment setting, type of ongoing anti-cancer therapy and COVID-19 clinical course (phenotype, hospitalization, therapy, duration and outcome). Eligibility required a positive COVID-19 molecular test before May 4th, 2020 and at least 1 course of antitumor therapy delivered after January 15th. Results: At the present analysis data are available for 116 of 168 centers (7 declined, 28 pending, 17 data awaited). 64 of 116 centers (55%) had COVID-19 positive cases (cases /center: median 3, range 1-40). At these 64 centers, 283 positive cases (males 158, 55.9% - females 125, 44.1%;median age 67 years, range 28-89) were observed among a total population of 40894 patients receiving active treatment between January 15 and May 4 2020. 65 of 283 (23%) had cardiovascular comorbidities and 7 (2%) pre-existent pulmonary disease. 239/283 patients (84.4%) were receiving treatment for metastatic disease and 44 (15.6%) in the adjuvant setting. Breast, lung, colon and prostate cancer were the main tumor types accounting for 61 % of cases. Conclusions: The occurrence of COVID-19 among cancer patients receiving active antitumor treatment appears to reflect tumor epidemiology. Full analysis of the distribution of COVID-19 occurrence and clinical course by tumor type, stage and oncologic treatment will be presented. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.